Skip to main content

Bulk and Named-Individual CoS Requests — What the Home Office Requires

Understanding what the Home Office requires when naming individuals in constable quests.

Written by Tom Hext

Undefined vs named CoS requests

When a sponsor applies to the Home Office for additional CoS allocations, they can request either undefined CoS (a general allocation not tied to specific workers) or defined CoS (tied to a named individual who has already been offered sponsorship). For undefined CoS requests, particularly where large numbers are requested, the Home Office may ask the sponsor to provide supporting evidence.

What the Home Office may ask for

For larger allocation requests, the Home Office commonly requests that the sponsor name the individuals they intend to sponsor, along with supporting documentation demonstrating genuine need. If you have requested, for example, 60 CoS but can only name 10 individuals at this stage, the Home Office may ask you to justify the remaining allocation or reduce the request to match the number of named candidates.

Borderless will guide you through responding to any Home Office request for further information. If you receive such a request, do not respond directly without first contacting your Borderless case worker, as the framing of the response can affect the outcome.

Switching candidates and unused CoS

If a CoS has been assigned to one worker but needs to be reassigned or if the wrong SOC code was used, the original CoS cannot simply be amended in most cases. Depending on the stage of the application, it may be necessary to withdraw the offer and create a new one. This will not affect the broader sponsorship arrangements. Contact Borderless before withdrawing any offer to confirm the correct process.

Did this answer your question?